Based on the analysis result of "Compile Option" in Pro-G's "DivX Converter", it shows that the same file name as the source codes of DeCSS, DVD2avi, bbMPEG, and Lame exist. This software supposedly be based on GPL so wouldn't there be an obligation to disclose the source code of "DivX Converter"? Also Dollby AC-3 Decoder is included but do they have a license agreement with Dollby? But first of all wouldn't selling a software with DeCSS mounted be illegal in Japan? This sure is a software with lots of controversies.
If all these sourses are passively linked to the software itself, it's violating the GPL of DeCSS and DVD2avi but also LGPL of Lame. Of course this software can't be legal at the point where bbMPEG, which cannot be modified except on redistribution, is included. Only the developpers can accuse them but we would like this issues to be fully disclosed.
これって本家にモデレートしたほうが良いんじゃない? (スコア:0)
試訳パート2 (スコア:2, 参考になる)
If all these sourses are passively linked to the software itself, it's violating the GPL of DeCSS and DVD2avi but also LGPL of Lame. Of course this software can't be legal at the point where bbMPEG, which cannot be modified except on redistribution, is included. Only the developpers can accuse them but we would like this issues to be fully disclosed.
ナマモノが専門なので専門用語などの点では自信がありませんが、
通訳・翻訳を副業としてるのでだいたいこれで通じると思います。
タレコミ文のほとんどを訳しましたが、
「このバイナリ配付に派生物全体のソースもしくは全ての第三者にソースを提供する書面が付属していない場合は。また、派生物はGPLでなければいけない。」
の部分は意味がイマイチ判らなかったため抜かしました。
-------------------------------------
「早くアレゲになりた〜い」by エセあれげ人間