The use of the "multipart" media type with only a single body part
may be useful in certain contexts, and is explicitly permitted.
NOTE: Experience has shown that a "multipart" media type with a
single body part is useful for sending non-text media types. It has
the advantage of providing the preamble as a place to include
decoding instructions
DDIは悪くないんじゃ? (スコア:0)
ドコモが一方的に悪いように感じるけど?
RFC2046対応してないのかちゃんと検証したの? (スコア:0)
規格を乱用するのがいけないのか、規格から勝手な仮定を導いちゃんと実装して いないのがいけないのか…。 MIME規格の詳しい人の助言希望。
Re:RFC2046対応してないのかちゃんと検証したの? (スコア:2, 参考になる)
The use of the "multipart" media type with only a single body part
may be useful in certain contexts, and is explicitly permitted.
NOTE: Experience has shown that a "multipart" media type with a
single body part is useful for sending non-text media types. It has
the advantage of providing the preamble as a place to include
decoding instructions
とあります。かいつまむと、
・パートが一つだけの"multipart"はOK
・non-textなデータを送る時に便利だよ
だからRFC2046的にはDocomoもDDIもハズしてる…?