by
Anonymous Coward
on 2010年12月29日 19時10分
(#1881541)
>With cerium being the most abundant “rare-earth” metal, the developers of the device from the California Institute of Technology and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology say it would be economically feasible to use the technology on a large scale
＞This inefficiency is because most of the energy is lost through heat loss through the reactor’s wall or through the re-radiation of sunlight back through the device’s aperture. However, the researchers believe that a commercially viable device with efficiency rates of up to 19 percent is possible by using better insulation and smaller apertures.
大規模使用は困難？ (スコア:3, 参考になる)
>With cerium being the most abundant “rare-earth” metal, the developers of the device from the California Institute of Technology and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology say it would be economically feasible to use the technology on a large scale
上記のようにgizmagでは、
「セリウムは最も豊富なレアアースなため、技術の大規模使用は経済的に可能となるだろう」
って言ってんだが。
独自の意見を付け加えたの？
Re: (スコア:0)
さらにいえば，
＞This inefficiency is because most of the energy is lost through heat loss through the reactor’s wall or through the re-radiation of sunlight back through the device’s aperture. However, the researchers believe that a commercially viable device with efficiency rates of up to 19 percent is possible by using better insulation and smaller apertures.
上記のように，今後エネルギー効率を19パーセントまで上げるための方向性についても書かれていますね．それでも机上の空論といえばそれまでだけど，元記事すら読まずに「単なるタラレバじゃん」とか言う人々の想像よりはマシかと．